An Essay A Day For A Year
By Roe
Day 57, February 26, 2012
***
Here we go with the age old philosophical debate of what came first, the chicken or the egg? It would be better to re coin the great philosophical conundrum to say: what came first, the hen or the egg?, since male chickens don’t lay eggs. So, what came first, the hen or the egg? Now, we’ll add my personal metaphors for the sake of this essay, that the chicken is the woman, and the egg is her son. What came first, Momma, or the son that she raises to be a Papa and inseminate a Momma? You could go round and round on that philosophical ferris wheel for a long time. If a Momma doesn’t lay her son the egg, how can he grow up to inseminate females? If he doesn’t inseminate females, how is the female going to become a Momma? Yikes.
Let’s forget the misogynistic and chauvinistic world of the three not so great religions that unbelievably purport God as male and man to be first. That works good for the guys, but what about the gals? Any woman that believes God to be male and man to be first is at once denigrated, and the first self imposed victim of misogyny and male chauvinism. Any man that believes God to be male and man to be first is the first misogynist and male chauvinist, but this idea is well known. Men are misogynists and male chauvinists. We say that this is a man’s world, and we are aware of the fact that women are gaining in power and acceptance as equals. That is a very funny statement. If we have the three male centered religions as a backdrop, we now have the philosophical statement: “The male egg comes first, and the hen afterwards”. I say try and tell that to the hen or woman. With the three male centered archaic belief systems still as backdrops, women are only hens and are a result of males. That is a very funny statement. Anyone who believes that women are hens and a result of males has never had a mother.
The term for a woman hater is a misogynist, and misogynists are male chauvinists. It is well documented how certain men hate women and, as male chauvinists, treat them secondarily and subserviently. All one has to do is read the three primary religious texts to find the roots of males that subserve females, from God down to Son and all prophets, and anyone of any power, all males. And then we have the poor innocent hens that lay us godlike men who grow up to be misogynists and chauvinists, and who subserve innocent and victimized females. This is beginning to sound very strange. A world filled with big, powerful men, and all the little well meaning women sadly victimized in the background just waiting for recognition. Anyone who believes this has never had a Momma.
How many of you readers know the term for a man hater? You might think that a feminist is the term, but a feminist is the female version of a male chauvinist. The term for a man hater is a “misandrist”. There are as many misandrists in the world as there are misogynists, actually, maybe a lot more. With a male god, male god’s son, and every one of any power or rights throughout history being male, in a man’s world of misogyny and male chauvinism, there are at least as many misandrists in the world as misogynists, but probably a lot more.
So, let’s evolve our philosophical hen and egg dilemma: Who came first, the misandrist or the misogynist? Maybe we should look at what causes a misogynist or misandrist to go any further. The key word is hate, and so what causes a man to hate a woman, or woman to hate a man? Hate is not a thing, but the result of a thing. It is possible to produce hate, and it is possible to unproduce hate. Hate is just a result. The thing is Love. You cannot produce Love, and you cannot unproduce Love. Love cannot be a result. Love is and was and will be, no matter what you do or don’t do. Hate is simply the result of hurt and angry Love. The thing is Love, and when it becomes hurt and disappointed and lost, hate is produced.
A misogynist and male chauvinist man is a man who is hurt and rageful at women. A misogynist and male chauvinist man is a man who is deeply Loving and in Love with women, but who is deeply hurt, and disappointed, and angry at women. A misogynist and male chauvinist man turned to hate and denigration and mistreatment of women is a result of “the” woman who hurt and disappointed and enraged him. If a man is the male egg, and if a man is misogynist and male chauvinist, he was created by a hen, his Momma. Mommas create misogyny and male chauvinism in their sons.
A misandrist and feminist is a woman who is hurt and rageful at men. A misandrist and feminist woman is a woman who is deeply Loving and in Love with men, but who is deeply hurt, and disappointed, and angry at men. A misandrist and feminist woman turned to hate and denigration and mistreatment of men is a result of “the” man who hurt and disappointed and enraged her. If a woman is the hen, and if a woman is misandrist and feminist, she was created by the male egg, her Papa. Papas create misandry and feminism in their daughters, the hens.
Every man on Earth is a misogynist and male chauvinist to some degree, and the degree depends on the level of pain and disappointment that he feels regarding his mother. The worst mothers produce the worst misogynists and male chauvinists. Every woman on Earth is a misandrist and feminist to some degree, and the degree depends on the level of pain and disappointment the she feels regarding her father. The worst fathers produce the worst misandrists and feminists.
Everyone hears about men as misogynists and male chauvinists and what they do to women and how and where and when and why. And thanks for that. Men need to recognize their hate and behavior towards women and his own daughter, and how they as men are simply hurt and disappointed when they loved “her” so much. Hate can be undone with grieving and healing of the heart, and Love for “her” will return. Everyone knows what a seducer or womanizer or ogre or bastard or whore monger or pervert man is, but they are only the extremes. These and all men, to a degree, have terrible pain regarding their misandrist and feminist mothers, the cause of their hatred.
Everyone sees the woman seducer and manizer and woman ogre and bitch and slut and whore as a victim, and the result of his misogyny. How clever of her, and how lethal to him. It is very difficult indeed to see a woman’s hatred openly like you can see a man’s. She is in fact a misandrist seducer, hating manizer, misandrist ogre, hating bitch, misandrist slut, hating whore, and her acts and behavior are weapons against men, and most lethal of all, towards her son. It is time to hear a lot more about her as hater and perpetrator, and not just as victim. Women need to recognize their hate and behavior towards men and their own sons, and how they are simply hurt and disappointed when they loved “him” so much. Hate can be undone with grieving and healing of the heart, and Love for “him” will return. These women are only the extremes. These women and all women to a degree have terrible pain regarding their misogynist and male chauvinist fathers, the cause of their hatred. It is very difficult indeed to see the horrendous and subtle repertoire that women have to hate men and in the end create woman haters out of his wound and disappointment. She then is seen as victim, enraging her victimized man.
So now our question comes to, “who hurt who first to cause who to hate who first, to cause who to produce the next generation of who hated who first?” I say what we call it a tie, and admit that hateful Momma produces hateful Boy, who grows up to hate Women. I say that we call it a tie, and hateful Papa produces hateful Girl, and his false, bias religion and world enrage Momma to hate Boy. And on and on it goes.
Momma is attracted to a man who hates her, and Dada is attracted to women that he hates, and they raise daughters who hate men, and sons who hate women. In actuality, Momma is attracted to a man that loves her, but that man is very hurt and angry deep inside about his own Momma. Dada is attracted to a woman that loves him, but that woman is very hurt and angry deep inside about her own Dada. Baby boy or girl simply download and inherit and live out the paradigm of their Loving parents, deep inside feeling hurt and hateful at each other, and maybe knowing it or showing it obviously, or in many hidden ways.
So what came first, the hen or the egg? I say that the man loving hens arrived here on Earth miraculously out of the sky with millions of others, all pregnant with sons, and she and they loved him and all the hims. And then we all repeated all the Love. Cool. That is the end of that philosophical conundrum.
See you tomorrow.
yourpersonalmuse@gmx.com
No comments:
Post a Comment